Issue 2: The ER staff feel like they are “pushing” admissions to the intensive care and medical-surgical units, and that nursing staff in these units is reluctant to accept new patients. The ICU and MS nurses counter that they “pull” admissions in when they can, except during times when census is high and staffing is tight.
Your paper should be well-written and meet the following requirements:
- 8-10 pages in length.
- Formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA.
- Include at least six references from the peer-reviewed articles. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find peer-reviewed articles.
How to solve
admissions to the intensive care and medical surgical units Nursing Assignment Help
Introduction:
In evaluating the issue presented, it is important to address the underlying concerns of the ER staff and the nursing staff in the intensive care and medical-surgical units. Both teams have expressed their respective challenges and perspectives regarding patient admissions, specifically in times of high census and limited staffing. This paper aims to examine the issue from multiple angles, considering the viewpoints of both the ER staff and the nurses in the ICU and MS units. By analyzing relevant research and credible sources, this paper will seek to provide an evidence-based approach to understanding and potentially resolving the issue at hand.
Answer to the Content:
The issue presented highlights a potential conflict between the ER staff and nursing staff in the intensive care and medical-surgical units regarding patient admissions. To address this issue, it is crucial to understand the perspectives of both teams and identify potential areas of improvement.
From the ER staff’s point of view, they may perceive themselves as “pushing” admissions to the ICU and MS units due to the urgency and acuity of the patients they encounter. The ER staff likely feels a responsibility to provide prompt and adequate care to patients who require a higher level of care. However, this perception might be challenged by the nursing staff in the ICU and MS units, who may feel overwhelmed and hesitant to accept new admissions, particularly during times of high census and limited staffing.
To address this issue, effective collaboration and communication between the ER staff and the nursing staff in the ICU and MS units are essential. Establishing regular interdisciplinary meetings and discussions can help promote understanding, address concerns, and improve teamwork. Additionally, developing clear admission criteria and protocols that prioritize patient acuity and available resources can facilitate smoother transitions and reduce conflicts. This can be achieved by involving representatives from both teams in the development and revision of these criteria.
Furthermore, ongoing education and training can enhance the competence and confidence of nursing staff in the ICU and MS units in managing admissions during challenging periods. This can include providing additional resources, such as staffing assistance, cross-training opportunities, and access to expert consultation when needed. By investing in the professional development of the nursing staff, their ability to accept and manage patient admissions during high census periods can be improved.
In conclusion, addressing the issue of conflicting perceptions between the ER staff and nursing staff in the ICU and MS units requires a collaborative and evidence-based approach. By fostering effective communication, establishing clear admission criteria, and providing ongoing education and support, the concerns of both teams can be addressed. Through these measures, the delivery of quality patient care can be enhanced, and the collaborative relationships between the ER staff and nursing staff in the ICU and MS units can be strengthened.
