When you have finished reading the biography on your selected leader, and with the help of your guidance outline (Submitted in Week 9), complete your paper that analyzes the person through the four frames of leadership: structural, human resources, political, and symbolic. Address how personality, leadership style, influence, and motivation factored into the successes and failures of the person. The structure of your paper should be as follows:
- Introduction: Who you selected and why (remember this is not a first person paper).
- Background of the person.
- Explain how do personality, leadership style, influence, and motivation factored into the persons success or failure (these points may not be explicitly addressed in your biography, but you should have enough information based on our coursework to make some logical determinations about these aspects of your selected person).
- Analyze how the person functioned within the structural frame.
- Analyze how the person functioned within the human resource frame.
- Analyze how the person functioned within the political frame.
- Analyze how the person functioned within the symbolic frame.
- Explain how the four frame interacted, impacted, and/or influenced the person’s perspective.
- Conclusion
Remember that your final paper submission is not a question and answer document. You are to analyze the information you find, organize it, and present it in a paper that is 12-15 pages in length. Your paper should be written at the college level, adhere to APA guidelines, and include a reference list. Any sources used must be cited properly, including the biography, using in-text citations and a references page.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction: For this assignment, the selected person is [name]. This individual was chosen for the analysis based on [reason/relevance]. The paper will examine the person’s leadership through the four frames: structural, human resources, political, and symbolic. Additionally, it will explore the influence of personality, leadership style, influence, and motivation on the person’s successes and failures. The structure of the paper will follow the provided guidelines, analyzing each frame separately before addressing their interaction and impact. The analysis will draw on relevant information from the person’s background and other sources, all properly cited according to APA guidelines.
Background of the person: In this section, a comprehensive overview of the selected person’s background will be presented. This will include relevant biographical information, educational attainment, career highlights, and notable accomplishments or failures. By examining the person’s background, we can establish a foundation for understanding the factors that influenced their leadership approach.
Personality, leadership style, influence, and motivation: The analysis will delve into how the selected person’s personality traits, leadership style, influence, and motivation played a role in their successes and failures. Personality traits may include characteristics such as assertiveness, empathy, resilience, or openness to new ideas. Leadership style refers to the approach the individual adopted when leading others, such as being autocratic, democratic, or transformational. Influence refers to the ability to persuade or inspire others, while motivation relates to what drove the person to achieve their goals. Through examination of these factors, we can gain insights into how they impacted the person’s overall effectiveness as a leader.
Analysis within the structural frame: This section will assess how the selected person functioned within the structural frame of leadership. The structural frame focuses on organizational design, roles, and processes. It examines how the person navigated hierarchical structures, established formal authority, and implemented systems and procedures. By evaluating their approach within the structural frame, we can understand the extent to which the person effectively utilized formal structures to achieve their objectives.
Analysis within the human resource frame: In this part, we will analyze how the selected person functioned within the human resource frame. The human resource frame emphasizes the importance of people, relationships, and development within an organization. It explores how the person managed human capital, built teams, motivated individuals, and addressed conflicts. By examining their actions within the human resource frame, we can assess their ability to create a positive and productive work environment.
Analysis within the political frame: This section will examine how the selected person functioned within the political frame of leadership. The political frame delves into power dynamics, alliances, and decision-making processes within an organization. It evaluates the person’s ability to build coalitions, navigate competing interests, and negotiate conflicts. By analyzing their behavior within the political frame, we can understand their aptitude for managing organizational politics and influencing outcomes.
Analysis within the symbolic frame: This part will explore how the selected person functioned within the symbolic frame of leadership. The symbolic frame focuses on culture, values, and meaning within an organization. It examines how the person communicated vision, created symbols, and fostered a shared sense of identity. Through analyzing their actions within the symbolic frame, we can assess their ability to inspire and engage others through storytelling, rituals, and symbols.
Interaction and impact of the four frames: In this section, we will explain how the four frames of leadership interacted, impacted, and influenced the selected person’s perspective. By considering the interplay between the structural, human resources, political, and symbolic frames, we can gain a holistic understanding of how the person’s leadership approach was shaped and evolved.
Conclusion: The paper will conclude by summarizing the key findings and insights gained from the analysis. It will provide a concise overview of how the selected person’s personality, leadership style, influence, and motivation contributed to their successes and failures within the four frames of leadership. Additionally, it may reflect on the broader implications of this analysis and potential lessons that can be drawn for future leaders.
Note: The content above provides an outline of how to approach and structure the analysis as per the given instructions. The specific details and information will vary depending on the chosen leader and available sources.
