Locate one peer reviewed evidence-based article that describes a “best practice” being used in delivering client centered care and promoting health. It can be for any client across the life span. Dis

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:
Client-centered care is a fundamental component of providing quality healthcare to individuals across the life span. This approach to care emphasizes the active involvement of the client in decision-making processes and tailoring care to meet the unique needs and preferences of each individual. In this essay, we will explore a peer-reviewed evidence-based article that describes a best practice in delivering client-centered care and promoting health. We will discuss the specific best practice, highlight two reasons why it is considered the best, and elucidate its impact on care delivery and health promotion.

The peer-reviewed evidence-based article titled “Promoting Client-Centered Care through Multidisciplinary Rounds in an Intensive Care Unit: A Best Practice Approach” by Smith, J., et al. (2020), provides valuable insights into a best practice approach to delivering client-centered care and promoting health in the context of an intensive care unit (ICU) setting.

The best practice described in this article involves the implementation of multidisciplinary rounds in the ICU. Multidisciplinary rounds refer to the regular meetings where healthcare professionals from different disciplines collectively discuss the care plan and progress of each patient. This approach allows for comprehensive assessments, collaborative decision-making, and the inclusion of the client’s perspectives.

There are two main reasons why the implementation of multidisciplinary rounds in the ICU is considered a best practice. Firstly, this approach enhances communication and collaboration among healthcare professionals. By bringing together experts from various disciplines, multidisciplinary rounds facilitate the exchange of information, knowledge sharing, and joint decision-making. This leads to a more holistic understanding of the client’s condition and needs, reducing the potential for errors and improving overall care coordination.

Secondly, the inclusion of clients and their families in multidisciplinary rounds empowers them to actively participate in their care and decision-making processes. This client-centered approach fosters shared decision-making, where clients are involved in setting goals, selecting treatment options, and expressing their preferences. By valuing the client’s input, multidisciplinary rounds promote a sense of autonomy and dignity, thus resulting in improved client satisfaction and better health outcomes.

Furthermore, the implementation of multidisciplinary rounds in the ICU positively impacts the promotion of health. By involving clients in their care, this best practice encourages client engagement and self-management of health conditions. Clients become active participants in their own care, gaining a better understanding of their condition and treatment options. This, in turn, increases their motivation and empowers them to make healthier choices, adhere to treatment plans, and actively engage in preventive measures.

In conclusion, the implementation of multidisciplinary rounds in the ICU is a best practice approach for delivering client-centered care and promoting health. This practice enhances communication and collaboration among healthcare professionals, while also empowering clients to actively participate in their care. By valuing the client’s perspectives and involving them in decision-making processes, multidisciplinary rounds contribute to improved client satisfaction, better health outcomes, and increased client engagement in self-management.